Obama District Court Judge Rules California’s Non-Resident Concealed Carry Ban Violates the Second Amendment
The State cannot point to a single law from the Founding or framing tradition that wholesale blocked nonresidents from participating […]
The State cannot point to a single law from the Founding or framing tradition that wholesale blocked nonresidents from participating […]
“Someone should be allowed to show the court in an appeal that all of this evidence did not satisfy – there was not a violation. He should be released, and his conviction should be overturned.”
At this point everyone following the National Firearms Act debate is well aware of then-Attorney General Cummings’ famous testimony in
An infinite number of laws on the books are worthless unless they are used to prosecute people with illegal machine guns and conversion devices instead of seeking to shift responsibility for these crimes onto gunmaker GLOCK, Inc.
Both Ceasefire Oregon and the Washington-based Alliance for Gun Responsibility have one-gun-per-month provisions in their legislative agendas.
It’s been an interesting week for the Ninth Circus. First they slapped down a former Supreme Court Justice’s brother’s attempt
The court as a whole and the two concurrences hurtle pell-mell toward making it virtually impossible for plaintiffs like Mexico to successfully plead their claims.
Three years ago, SCOTUS ruled in New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v. Bruen that the Second Amendment is not a second-class right. Regrettably, not every state got the message.
How is this going to flesh out? We’ll have to see if the AGs are granted a sweeping nationwide injunction on the settlement. Or maybe this will all be a waste of taxpayer funds on another politically motivated frivolous lawsuit.
Mexico’s amorphous theory of liability is seriously in question after the Smith & Wesson decision. As was true in that case, Mexico’s allegations in the Arizona lawsuit likewise constitute a generalized complaint about how firearms are sold in the US.