They say the things they’re supposed to say. They don’t have to believe it. For bankers and politicians, it comes down to the ultimate goal of money and power. The sheep feel better when they hear the proper words spoken to them. “It’s okay. There, there. Go back to sleep. Shhh.”

“Simply put, we do not tolerate acts of intimidation and violence, and we denounce antisemitism, Islamophobia, acts of hatred, discrimination and prejudice of any kind.”
To the point, is Citigroup financing anyone in Hamas, The Palestinian Authority, Gaza or the west bank for that matter? Is it even legal to do so? Is this not somehow Islamophobia by all the usual contortions and how do they square this dissonance.

That isn’t cognitive dissonance. Their ultimate belief is in money. They know which side their bread is buttered , and it isn’t with small firearms businesses. Also, being for strict gun control for the average citizen is completely different from being against war financing.

Democrats have been helping to fund and arm extremist groups in the Middle East for decades now. That isn’t cognitive dissonance either. Their ultimate belief is in power, not gun control.

I love how they always have to insert “we condemn Islamophobia” while they’re condemning antisemitism. Why don’t they ever condemn Christophobia? That word doesn’t exist as far as they’re concerned.

Pro-Hamas activists: “Gas the Jews!”
Democrats: “We condemn Islamophobia!”

Pro-Hamas activists shoving and blocking Jews: “Stop oppressing me!”
Democrats: “We condemn Islamophobia!”

Democrat in the US Congress intentionally dropping well-known Jewish tropes.
Democrats: “We condemn Islamophobia!”