And, just where, pray tell, is the fun in that??

Your politics are really none of my business as long as they don’t interfere with me or my life. I don’t generally care about the politics of any company with which I do business unless they’re doing something overt that’s grossly at odd with my beliefs.

Got DEI policies? Don’t care.
Donate to Democrats (or Republicans)? Don’t care.
Give to LBTQXYZ groups? Don’t care.
Don’t give to LBTQXYZ groups? Don’t care.

Refuse me entry because of my 2A beliefs or because I carry? Okay, THAT I care about.

‘ethical consumerism’ and ‘ethical consumption’ are two different things.

Ethical consumerism is a type of consumer activism choice based on the concept of dollar voting. In this idiot liberal missive he/she/it says this with “This is not a defense of companies like PSA, IWI, Spiritus Systems, etc., but rather a defense of the people who *have* to buy from them. The reality of being a liberal gun owner, especially in the United States, is that you are going to have to buy from company who’s [sic] beliefs [do] not align with yours. If you are in a position in life to be able to afford guns and ammo from an entirely left leaning company, that’s awesome and I hope you continue to do so.”

Ethical consumption is the practice of choice to purchase/support products/things that are made/presented in a way that reflect the persons personally held values and those personally held values are the ‘ethical’ choice for them. For example, in the pro-gun community we make the choice to buy guns in the free enterprise system ‘capitalism’ to exercise our second amendment right – that’s a choice of personally held value ‘ethic’ so we have ‘ethical consumption under capitalism’ by our ability to make a choice. And that’s all ‘ethical consumption’ is when it comes down to it, people making a choice using their own personally held values.

This liberal idiot doesn’t understand the difference. He/she/it starts their stupid missive with “There is no ethical consumption under capitalism.” when in reality there is always ‘ethical consumption under capitalism’ that this idiot says exists in his/her/its missive. And then the whole thing is about ‘ethical consumerism’ and then endorses choice, basically, ‘as long as you buy a gun’ …. directly not supporting and disproving his beginning line of “There is no ethical consumption under capitalism” which is a false logic statement and his whole missive.

All liberals have these types of logic holes in their thinking and do not see the holes in their thinking logic.

1. All systems have something that costs something and are ultimately ‘capitalism’ in nature. For example, communism is a ‘capitalism’ system that’s paid for by the forced subjugation of its people and the seized control of their production to serve the will of the state to keep the state functioning. Where ever there is something given for something, in any ‘society’ – its at its roots ‘capitalism’

2. There is actually no such thing as ‘ethical consumption’. There is consumption unchecked, there is consumption checked, there is consumption by choice. Any ‘ethical’ matters are simply in the eye of the beholder.

3. The statement “There is no ethical consumption under capitalism” is a false logic statement. The very fact that people can choose to not buy a gun in our free-enterprise system because they do not support the second amendment is a personal self choice ‘ethical’ decision to not ‘consume’ thus ‘ethical consumption’ because in the basic four points of the ‘ethical consumption’ view point is NOT ‘participating’ in those things which do not suit your liking.

“…
Now the court has issued another common sense decision in favor of our right to keep and bear arms: police don’t have the authority to stop and search someone just because they were carrying a gun.
…”

https://bearingarms.com/camedwards/2025/07/23/fifth-circuit-issues-another-common-sense-decision-on-guns-n1229364

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lErVDiQkPm0

The CRPA’s legal team just landed a major win in federal court—and it’s a game changer for CCW holders across California. In the lawsuit against the LA County Sheriff’s Department, the judge ruled in favor of CRPA, affirming its standing to sue on behalf of its members and rejecting LA’s attempt to delay, dodge, and deny concealed carry permits.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNXVSelvRyc

Senator Chris Murphey has introduced HR3944 to drastically increase the tax stamp from 0 to an outrageous number adjusted for inflation ($4,709.00). This is to push back against the HPA and SHORT in the One Big Beautiful Bill.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sd1BQW_cC-4

“No such thing as “an entirely left leaning company” that manufactures or sells guns”
There’s always Taurus, who directly participated in a socialist dictator’s takeover of their home country to keep their state monopoly. Plenty of state arsenals, but the only ones that will sell to random person in the US I can think of are Chinese shotguns (though their importers and FFLs likely disqualify them)