<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Progress: Citibank Abandons Its Discriminatory Anti-Gun Business Practices	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/business/progress-citibank-abandons-its-discriminitory-anti-gun-business-practices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/business/progress-citibank-abandons-its-discriminitory-anti-gun-business-practices/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 00:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/business/progress-citibank-abandons-its-discriminitory-anti-gun-business-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-45350</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2025 00:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=24822#comment-45350</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[CitiBank is merely pausing its anti-gun discrimination practices.  Once they believe no one is paying attention any longer, or an extreme, anti-gun president (and/or Congress) comes to the forefront, they will merely revert back to their true colours.  Citi Bank is not sorry for their anti-gun practices.  They are only sorry it brought them bad publicity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CitiBank is merely pausing its anti-gun discrimination practices.  Once they believe no one is paying attention any longer, or an extreme, anti-gun president (and/or Congress) comes to the forefront, they will merely revert back to their true colours.  Citi Bank is not sorry for their anti-gun practices.  They are only sorry it brought them bad publicity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/business/progress-citibank-abandons-its-discriminitory-anti-gun-business-practices/comment-page-1/#comment-44831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 00:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=24822#comment-44831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Many retailers have been following these best practices, and we hope communities and lawmakers will continue to seek out ways to prevent the tragic consequences of gun violence.&quot;

That right there, specifically the &quot;gun violence&quot; part. 

They may have in &#039;practice&#039; changed for a PR purpose and to avoid the legal issues that would have soon followed from the Trump DOJ if they did not change. What they were doing is illegal, and under the lawless unconstitutional-acts Biden junta tyranny DOJ nothing would have happened to them, but under the Trump DOJ they would have been prosecuted and Bondi was already looking into it. So I seriously doubt they had a &#039;come to Jesus&#039; moment and realized the error of their ways, and the use of the made up term &quot;gun violence&quot; indicates they are still hanging on to their anti-gun bias.

then this part:

&quot;We will update our employee Code of Conduct and our customer-facing Global Financial Access Policy to clearly state that we do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation in the same way we are clear that we do not discriminate on the basis of other traits such as race and religion. This will codify what we’ve long practiced, and we will continue to conduct trainings to ensure compliance. &quot;

Did you spot the lie in that? Here, let me point it out to you: &quot;This will codify what we’ve long practiced...&quot; &#060; that&#039;s the lie. Its a lie because they in fact DID NOT &#039;practice&#039; non-discrimination &#034;on the basis of political affiliation ... and religion...&#034; [and gun manufacturing/businesses], and in fact it was standard practice, even written into their own documents, to discriminate &#034;on the basis of political affiliation ... and religion...&#034; [and gun manufacturing/businesses] by designating them a &#039;bad risk&#039; to appease the lawless unconstitutional-acts Biden junta tyranny and bend to the will of democrat politician marxists and left wing marxists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many retailers have been following these best practices, and we hope communities and lawmakers will continue to seek out ways to prevent the tragic consequences of gun violence.&#8221;</p>
<p>That right there, specifically the &#8220;gun violence&#8221; part. </p>
<p>They may have in &#8216;practice&#8217; changed for a PR purpose and to avoid the legal issues that would have soon followed from the Trump DOJ if they did not change. What they were doing is illegal, and under the lawless unconstitutional-acts Biden junta tyranny DOJ nothing would have happened to them, but under the Trump DOJ they would have been prosecuted and Bondi was already looking into it. So I seriously doubt they had a &#8216;come to Jesus&#8217; moment and realized the error of their ways, and the use of the made up term &#8220;gun violence&#8221; indicates they are still hanging on to their anti-gun bias.</p>
<p>then this part:</p>
<p>&#8220;We will update our employee Code of Conduct and our customer-facing Global Financial Access Policy to clearly state that we do not discriminate on the basis of political affiliation in the same way we are clear that we do not discriminate on the basis of other traits such as race and religion. This will codify what we’ve long practiced, and we will continue to conduct trainings to ensure compliance. &#8221;</p>
<p>Did you spot the lie in that? Here, let me point it out to you: &#8220;This will codify what we’ve long practiced&#8230;&#8221; &lt; that&#039;s the lie. Its a lie because they in fact DID NOT &#039;practice&#039; non-discrimination &quot;on the basis of political affiliation &#8230; and religion&#8230;&quot; [and gun manufacturing/businesses], and in fact it was standard practice, even written into their own documents, to discriminate &quot;on the basis of political affiliation &#8230; and religion&#8230;&quot; [and gun manufacturing/businesses] by designating them a &#039;bad risk&#039; to appease the lawless unconstitutional-acts Biden junta tyranny and bend to the will of democrat politician marxists and left wing marxists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
