California laws.

“So my g19 tupperware may go up in value?”

At a minimum, it will hold its value…

The same crowd who cried ‘no change’ are now auditioning for Doomwatch.

Sooner or later GLOCK was going to make a few design changes to keep up with the times, and apparently they have decided now is as good a time as any. Rumors about the new “Gen 6/V” models have been circulating for the last couple of years, so it’s more likely that coincidental timing had more to do with it than Gov. Nuisance’s new GLOCK ban.

Swapping .40 and .357 barrels is one thing, but I think the .45 GAP barrels were larger in diameter and breech dimensions.

They made them fit into the same frame, but the slides were wider, along with the barrels, IIRC.

If Gaston Glock “believed civilians should never own his guns at all”, he never would have opened a branch in the USA that sold Glocks to non-military/LE. There was no requirement for him to do so just to get military/cop sales, and yet that is what he did, along with moving production to the USA for the vast majority of models sold here. He was the head of the company, and could have stopped “civilian” sales with a single edict, but he never did, so I think you are confused or have been mislead on this issue.

Actions speak louder than words.

Unless something drastic changes, it should fit just fine. Swapping from 40 to 357 or to 45GAP has always just been a barrel swap- same locking lug dimension and muzzle journal diameter