Talk is cheap for even the governor of California said he supported the 2A! You know whom I am talking about.

“Circle will work with our partners to ensure our values are reflected in our Terms.”

There in lies a problem. Its not their money, you got it with your money and that makes it your ‘money’. Their ‘terms’ and ‘values’ should not be determining. or interactive with, what you do with your money. Why is the firearms industry so eager to buy into the ‘digital currency’ thing? Its not run by any entity accountable to the people, they can impose their terms and values on how you can spend your money at any time, and its only a click away from locking you out of using your money to purchase things they may not agree with even though legal if they decide to do it. Its an anti-gun/anti-2A agenda vehicle waiting to happen with a mouse click.

Anti-gun play this ‘we support the second amendment’ game all the time while they continually go after trying to get rid of the second amendment in some aspect and eventually the whole thing.

So when an organization like a ‘financial thing goes ‘we bad, what we wrote very exactly and intentionally to keep you from exercising the 2A with your own money was, well, we didn’t really mean it” when they get caught at it tells me where their true mindset is at and its not genuinely supporting the 2A.

They didn’t say that exactly. Notice the very careful wording “as protected under the Second Amendment,” which can be interpreted as excluding things such as, for example, standard capacity magazine and optics.