Canadians have gained absolutely nothing in exchange for turning in common types of firearms they had previously been allowed to own for generations. They gave up their liberty and gained no safety in return.
Gavin Newsom vented his displeasure, writing “Californians voted to require background checks on ammunition. Their voices should matter.” That’s rich since the background check system in place now isn’t what Californians voted for at all.
In the recent discussion around the potential removal of suppressors and short barrel rifles from the provisions of the National
Newsom and his flunkies were probably too intimidated by their own gun laws to figure it out. For the low, low, price of a $10,000 donation to the Second Amendment Foundation, I’d be glad to help Newsom’s team figure this out.
I hate to discuss any apparent “pause” in mass shootings, because it feels like that’s tempting fate. However, it’s hard
“The tax cut is meaningless. No one cares about the tax. Killing registration was what would have mattered.” That’s insane to me. A reduction of $200 per suppressor or SBR is not chump change, especially for those who make their own.
You certainly should be demanding of the gun rights groups you support, I don’t begrudge anyone that. But at the same time, a lot of grifters who have never accomplished anything of note are taking cheap shots right now with bullshit accusations.
Giffords has a problem with the latest provision the Senate has inserted in the Big Beautiful Bill, even after it’s
At this point everyone following the National Firearms Act debate is well aware of then-Attorney General Cummings’ famous testimony in
The upshot is that the Court is really busy with other stuff right now, and you all should just come back later. This case has been pending for nearly four years. Maryland gun owners will just have to chill.
