thank you

“i’m too lazy to go try to look up what this case is about and why it matters.”

It’s *very* important, it deals (on the surface, anyways) with a regulatory agency the BATF, being able to call a pile of parts a gun, or not a gun. That leads directly to whether or not it requires a serial number (that the government can track) once it becomes finished enough to fire live ammunition…

“Listening to other commentary regarding this case, while it wasn’t argued very positively, this isn’t strictly a 2A case, but rather an Administrative Ruling Change with Criminal Consequences.”

Exactly, and on that point, I Think we’ll be fine.

What concerns me is whether or not they deal with the issue of building guns at home, for personal use, outside of the direct view of the government. That will be CRITICAL if we ever get an actual fascist in power who wants a grab at the metaphorical ‘Brass Ring’ and ban all guns.

The issue on the constitutionality of gun registration will have to be dealt with by this court, hopefully soon. That alone will deal with a *massive* number of gun laws.

“Furthermore, the 4 Justices who have yet to write an opinion for cases heard in October lean Conservative. That is to say, it doesn’t guarantee a 2A-positive ruling, however, the Court has been very critical of the Administrative State in recent years.”

That leaves me hopeful, as well. I’d like to know, will the court take the opportunity of this ruling and expand upon it?

“That is, if the ruling were to be “positive” for 2A and Freedom, then does the SG’s Office effectively “moot” the case, rendering the decision useless?”

We get to wait and see until late June, at the latest to find out. I hope the ruling is a blockbuster that they release it as they walk out and lock the doors until the fall session, giving the Leftist Scum ™ something to cope and seethe about all the long, hot summer long… 🙂