Comments on: It Looks Like ATF Got the Law Right in Its Decision About the Franklin Armory Antitheses

By: Geoff PR

Geoff PR — Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:17:03 +0000

In reply to LKB. "Only way to have a definitive ruling is to get a court order as to what the law is. Otherwise, what the AFT says is writ in water." Can we judge-court-shop like they do to get a ruling we want?

By: LKB

LKB — Fri, 26 Sep 2025 15:12:20 +0000

Except that ATF routinely “changes its mind” and decides its earlier interpretation was “in error.”

On many occasions (e.g., Atkins Accelerator, pistol braces), ATF announced one interpretation of the law, only to later do a complete 180 (to the detriment of those who relied on the original ruling / interpretation).

Only way to have a definitive ruling is to get a court order as to what the law is. Otherwise, what the AFT says is writ in water.

By: Dude

Dude — Fri, 26 Sep 2025 12:51:16 +0000

Ultimately, isn’t it potentially b-e-t-t-e-r* that the parliamentarian wasn’t fired since we have a chance of getting a favorable ruling on SBRs?

*gotta love WordPress

By: Dude

Dude — Fri, 26 Sep 2025 12:47:04 +0000

Republicans…are delusional enough to think that by [being nice], Democrats will someday return the favor…

This guy gets it. I just made a similar comment under another post.