Comments on: ATF Puts Bureaucratic Hurdles Up In Front of People Wanting Their Bump Stocks Back

By: Mulch film

Mulch film — Sat, 02 Aug 2025 03:02:25 +0000

963762 387808There is noticeably a bundle to learn about this. I assume you created specific nice points in features also. 787908

By: โคมไฟ

โคมไฟ — Wed, 21 May 2025 01:08:05 +0000

92058 973251Thanks for an additional informative post. Exactly where else could anyone get that kind of info in such a easy to recognize way of presentation. 974103

By: tZy7fUzqvD

tZy7fUzqvD — Wed, 26 Mar 2025 12:25:49 +0000

425011 848683very good post. Neer knew this, thanks for letting me know. 992094

By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR — Wed, 21 Aug 2024 04:15:36 +0000

In reply to LKB. " Remember, Cargill was decided under the APA, not 2A." Ah, yes, duh me. Thanks!

By: LKB

LKB — Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:39:03 +0000

In reply to Scoest. Exactly. Remember, Cargill was decided under the APA, not 2A.

By: Scoest

Scoest — Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:32:57 +0000

The SC only ruled that the order was an overreach, not that they were legal/illegal. So state bans are still in effect.

By: Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR

Geoff "I'm getting too old for this shit" PR — Mon, 19 Aug 2024 18:37:36 +0000

“More than a dozen states, including Florida, still prohibit possession of bump stocks.”

Doesn’t federal law over-rule state law?

Those bump stocks are shredded plastic by now, any ‘compensation’ will be a long time coming…