<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Shotgun Ammo: The Problem with No. 4 Buckshot for Home Defense	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 20:57:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-147811</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 20:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-147811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One problem is that #4 buckshot may over-penetrate walls.
Next point, #4 buckshot may under-penetrate bad guys.
That is confusing to me. How can you have it both ways? If it can over-penetrate walls, then it could surely penetrate a bad guy at home defense ranges. A slingshot with a metal ball can be deadly at those ranges. We are talking about a weapon that kicks like a mule here and small buckshot is not effective on humans at close ranges?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem is that #4 buckshot may over-penetrate walls.<br />
Next point, #4 buckshot may under-penetrate bad guys.<br />
That is confusing to me. How can you have it both ways? If it can over-penetrate walls, then it could surely penetrate a bad guy at home defense ranges. A slingshot with a metal ball can be deadly at those ranges. We are talking about a weapon that kicks like a mule here and small buckshot is not effective on humans at close ranges?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Bean		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-130222</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Bean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 21:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-130222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124247&quot;&gt;Leam&lt;/a&gt;.

one serving each with 00 buck is sufficient....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124247">Leam</a>.</p>
<p>one serving each with 00 buck is sufficient&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-128860</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 15:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-128860</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with the authors concerns over more pellets equals more chances of an unwanted hit. But his testing is at 15 yards (45 feet) and how much energy is a #4 buck pellet carrying vs a 12 ga pellet at that distance? Enough to get through the 8 layers of drywall BEYOND 45 feet? My closest neighbor&#039;s home is 150+ feet from my home and I seriously doubt #4 buck will be dangerous at that distance after exiting my homes walls. And since I only have myself and my wife to account for at home, I will stick with my 20 ga and #4 buck. Otherwise great article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the authors concerns over more pellets equals more chances of an unwanted hit. But his testing is at 15 yards (45 feet) and how much energy is a #4 buck pellet carrying vs a 12 ga pellet at that distance? Enough to get through the 8 layers of drywall BEYOND 45 feet? My closest neighbor&#8217;s home is 150+ feet from my home and I seriously doubt #4 buck will be dangerous at that distance after exiting my homes walls. And since I only have myself and my wife to account for at home, I will stick with my 20 ga and #4 buck. Otherwise great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TDHofstetter		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-128042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TDHofstetter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 01:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-128042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is there some particular reason &quot;.40 cal Booger&quot; is still permitted to post here?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there some particular reason &#8220;.40 cal Booger&#8221; is still permitted to post here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TDHofstetter		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-128041</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TDHofstetter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 01:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-128041</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124063&quot;&gt;SemperFido&lt;/a&gt;.

10 feet isn&#039;t even all the way across the room. 45 feet is a perfectly normal range at which to shoot an invader in your house.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124063">SemperFido</a>.</p>
<p>10 feet isn&#8217;t even all the way across the room. 45 feet is a perfectly normal range at which to shoot an invader in your house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TDHofstetter		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-128040</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TDHofstetter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 01:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-128040</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124124&quot;&gt;Void&lt;/a&gt;.

I live in a nearly square house (5/4 cape) and 30 feet is perfectly realistic orthogonally. Diagonally, a 30-foot house turns into a 45-foot house.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124124">Void</a>.</p>
<p>I live in a nearly square house (5/4 cape) and 30 feet is perfectly realistic orthogonally. Diagonally, a 30-foot house turns into a 45-foot house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TDHofstetter		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-128038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TDHofstetter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 01:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-128038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124247&quot;&gt;Leam&lt;/a&gt;.

You won&#039;t have much time to do that. Best just load up with #4 and be done with it.

Trust me, chances are very, very good you&#039;ll have multiples. Crackhead and meth freaks are like that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-124247">Leam</a>.</p>
<p>You won&#8217;t have much time to do that. Best just load up with #4 and be done with it.</p>
<p>Trust me, chances are very, very good you&#8217;ll have multiples. Crackhead and meth freaks are like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TDHofstetter		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-128037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TDHofstetter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 01:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-128037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-126177&quot;&gt;Mark Freburg&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ve looked at #1 buckshot loads. They&#039;re limiting. If you use shot cups (you probably do) in 2-3/4&quot; shells, you&#039;re limited to 7/8oz, 1-1/8oz, and 1-3/8oz loads. There just aren&#039;t any good ways to stack pellets for any other load weights. Both #4 and #00 give you four choices, at least... of which the biggest / baddest one for 2-3/4&quot; shells is a full 1-1/2oz load. Even in brass hulls with buit-up wad columns, you still have a lot of choices with #00... less with #4. But then... I load #4 in shot cups. That&#039;s 30 .25 caliber pellets downwind compared to your (at most) 14. My magazine contains 30 shots, yours contains 14. I&#039;d say I have the advantage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-126177">Mark Freburg</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve looked at #1 buckshot loads. They&#8217;re limiting. If you use shot cups (you probably do) in 2-3/4&#8243; shells, you&#8217;re limited to 7/8oz, 1-1/8oz, and 1-3/8oz loads. There just aren&#8217;t any good ways to stack pellets for any other load weights. Both #4 and #00 give you four choices, at least&#8230; of which the biggest / baddest one for 2-3/4&#8243; shells is a full 1-1/2oz load. Even in brass hulls with buit-up wad columns, you still have a lot of choices with #00&#8230; less with #4. But then&#8230; I load #4 in shot cups. That&#8217;s 30 .25 caliber pellets downwind compared to your (at most) 14. My magazine contains 30 shots, yours contains 14. I&#8217;d say I have the advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TDHofstetter		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-128034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TDHofstetter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 01:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-128034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 12-inch penetration standard, first off, is for fat boy targets. You&#039;re not likely to have fat boy targets entering your house, holding their nine em ems horizontally and bellowing at you to get down on the ground. Instead, you&#039;re going to have crackheads and meth babies coming in all hot, and they&#039;re going to weigh about 120 pounds and be about 6 inches thick.

Second, you&#039;re totally failing to take into consideration the fact that you don&#039;t have to hit &quot;heart, brain, and spinal cord&quot; to make the bad guys sit down and quit fighting. Have you ever had an arterial bleed? I have. It happens FAST. You make a big red pool in no time at all, and you lose strength and energy and motivation just as fast. Now guess where all your arteries are? That&#039;s right. They&#039;re inside your skin. Perhaps comedically, two of your most vulnerable arteries are in your thighs, below your parka. How thick are your thighs? Are they thicker than 20&quot;? If not, then 10&quot; penetraction will reach to, or past, centerline... making a vast puddle out of your femoral arteries. You know how fast a person shot in the femoral artery sits down and quits fighting? Clue: it happens before you can say &quot;GET DOWN ON THE GROUND FACING AWAY FROM ME M--- F---&quot;.

What&#039;s more, those 27 #4 buckshot pellets give you three times greater likelihood of nicking a femoral (or other, depending upon where you aim) artery than the nine #00 pellets give you.

&quot;Don&#039;t hit below the waist&quot; HMPH. Stop being polite and survive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 12-inch penetration standard, first off, is for fat boy targets. You&#8217;re not likely to have fat boy targets entering your house, holding their nine em ems horizontally and bellowing at you to get down on the ground. Instead, you&#8217;re going to have crackheads and meth babies coming in all hot, and they&#8217;re going to weigh about 120 pounds and be about 6 inches thick.</p>
<p>Second, you&#8217;re totally failing to take into consideration the fact that you don&#8217;t have to hit &#8220;heart, brain, and spinal cord&#8221; to make the bad guys sit down and quit fighting. Have you ever had an arterial bleed? I have. It happens FAST. You make a big red pool in no time at all, and you lose strength and energy and motivation just as fast. Now guess where all your arteries are? That&#8217;s right. They&#8217;re inside your skin. Perhaps comedically, two of your most vulnerable arteries are in your thighs, below your parka. How thick are your thighs? Are they thicker than 20&#8243;? If not, then 10&#8243; penetraction will reach to, or past, centerline&#8230; making a vast puddle out of your femoral arteries. You know how fast a person shot in the femoral artery sits down and quits fighting? Clue: it happens before you can say &#8220;GET DOWN ON THE GROUND FACING AWAY FROM ME M&#8212; F&#8212;&#8220;.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, those 27 #4 buckshot pellets give you three times greater likelihood of nicking a femoral (or other, depending upon where you aim) artery than the nine #00 pellets give you.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t hit below the waist&#8221; HMPH. Stop being polite and survive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Freburg		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/shotgun-ammo-the-problem-with-no-4-buckshot-for-home-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-126177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Freburg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 21:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=31056#comment-126177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I read this I grew more and more frustrated.  Back when I was in law enforcement my agency issued No.1 Buck, but here we are comparing No.4 with 00 Buck.  Finally, at article&#039;s conclusion, there is a mention of No.1 Buck.  I tested No.1 Buck in my own defensive shotgun and stocked up my ammo cabinet with it decades ago.  You won&#039;t find me using 00 OR #4 Buck.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read this I grew more and more frustrated.  Back when I was in law enforcement my agency issued No.1 Buck, but here we are comparing No.4 with 00 Buck.  Finally, at article&#8217;s conclusion, there is a mention of No.1 Buck.  I tested No.1 Buck in my own defensive shotgun and stocked up my ammo cabinet with it decades ago.  You won&#8217;t find me using 00 OR #4 Buck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
