<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ninth Circuit Victory on Hold as California Seeks En Banc Rehearing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 05:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark N.		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-71951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark N.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 05:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-71951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61956&quot;&gt;Chris T in&lt;/a&gt;.

With all the book banning going on in Florida, it appears that the MAGA Republicans down there are not too supporti9ve of the First Amendment either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61956">Chris T in</a>.</p>
<p>With all the book banning going on in Florida, it appears that the MAGA Republicans down there are not too supporti9ve of the First Amendment either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark N.		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-71948</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark N.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 05:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-71948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-65251&quot;&gt;J. Seitz&lt;/a&gt;.

Maybe because your timeline is off? It is a lot more than 3 days, 30 in fact if I recall correctly, and that time may be extended by application to the court. So just assume that the r4equest was timely, an assumption reinforced by the fact that the Plaintiffs are not yelling and screaming about untimeliness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-65251">J. Seitz</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe because your timeline is off? It is a lot more than 3 days, 30 in fact if I recall correctly, and that time may be extended by application to the court. So just assume that the r4equest was timely, an assumption reinforced by the fact that the Plaintiffs are not yelling and screaming about untimeliness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark N.		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-71947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark N.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2025 05:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-71947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve never thought to ask: Is California the only state that requires face to face sales with a background check to buy ammunition? I really do miss the days when there would be a heavy box sitting at my front door. Not only is the convenience lost, but brick and mortar stores prices are higher and the selection significantly restricted. Last time I was perusing rifle ammo at the local Sportsman&#039;s Warehouse, there were a number of choices for various leaded ammunition, but hardly any selection at all for solid copper rounds (unless you roll your own, which I do). 

Given the infamy of the Ninth Circuit en banc panels and their regularity in overturning pro-rights decisions and their usual practice of interminable delays and stays to avoid making a decision for as l long as possible, if en banc is granted oral argument is not likely to occur for six or eight months, with a decision a year or two after that. Sad, sad, sad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never thought to ask: Is California the only state that requires face to face sales with a background check to buy ammunition? I really do miss the days when there would be a heavy box sitting at my front door. Not only is the convenience lost, but brick and mortar stores prices are higher and the selection significantly restricted. Last time I was perusing rifle ammo at the local Sportsman&#8217;s Warehouse, there were a number of choices for various leaded ammunition, but hardly any selection at all for solid copper rounds (unless you roll your own, which I do). </p>
<p>Given the infamy of the Ninth Circuit en banc panels and their regularity in overturning pro-rights decisions and their usual practice of interminable delays and stays to avoid making a decision for as l long as possible, if en banc is granted oral argument is not likely to occur for six or eight months, with a decision a year or two after that. Sad, sad, sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: J. Seitz		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-65251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[J. Seitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2025 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-65251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I had previously read that an Appeal by the State of California, to the 9th Circuit’s 3 Judge panel’s (Unanimous Decision) eliminating the “Ammo Ban” must be filed with 3 days of their ruling.  The 3 Judge Panel, agreeing that the Ban was Unconstitutional, occurred on or about July 24, 2025.  Yet, the appeal filed by the State of California requesting an En Banc review did not occur until August 7th.  [The dates stated are from memory &#038; may be “+/-“, yet no Appeal was filed within the 3 day (72 Hour) appeal period.   Hence, how can the State of California challenge the decision if they did not file an appeal for En Banc review approximately 2 weeks later?  Or, alternatively, what is the time period within which an En Banc appeal request must be filed to be compliant with the rules &#038; regulations for a Federal Circuit Court?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had previously read that an Appeal by the State of California, to the 9th Circuit’s 3 Judge panel’s (Unanimous Decision) eliminating the “Ammo Ban” must be filed with 3 days of their ruling.  The 3 Judge Panel, agreeing that the Ban was Unconstitutional, occurred on or about July 24, 2025.  Yet, the appeal filed by the State of California requesting an En Banc review did not occur until August 7th.  [The dates stated are from memory &amp; may be “+/-“, yet no Appeal was filed within the 3 day (72 Hour) appeal period.   Hence, how can the State of California challenge the decision if they did not file an appeal for En Banc review approximately 2 weeks later?  Or, alternatively, what is the time period within which an En Banc appeal request must be filed to be compliant with the rules &amp; regulations for a Federal Circuit Court?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fjb		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-64203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fjb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 04:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-64203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-62376&quot;&gt;Dave I.&lt;/a&gt;.

I grew up here! I aint leaving - you can and take the scum with you when we POP!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-62376">Dave I.</a>.</p>
<p>I grew up here! I aint leaving &#8211; you can and take the scum with you when we POP!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fjb		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-64202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fjb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 04:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-64202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61575&quot;&gt;Chris T in KY&lt;/a&gt;.

BS - Yes WE will! This We&#039;ll Defend!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61575">Chris T in KY</a>.</p>
<p>BS &#8211; Yes WE will! This We&#8217;ll Defend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: FJB		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-64199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[FJB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 04:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-64199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Justice delayed = justice denied. Patriots WIN!!! The devil(s)/Swamp creatures INSECTS/REPTILES Lose!!! F&#039;em ALL!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice delayed = justice denied. Patriots WIN!!! The devil(s)/Swamp creatures INSECTS/REPTILES Lose!!! F&#8217;em ALL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave I.		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-62376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave I.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 09:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-62376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61575&quot;&gt;Chris T in KY&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately you are 100% correct. If you want to enjoy the freedoms that our great nation is based upon, you are going to have to move out of California. That is, if you are still allowed to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61575">Chris T in KY</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately you are 100% correct. If you want to enjoy the freedoms that our great nation is based upon, you are going to have to move out of California. That is, if you are still allowed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris T in		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris T in]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 16:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-61956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61844&quot;&gt;.40 cal Booger&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m glad the &quot;days&quot; have the 1st amendment right to say these things disgusting things in the 21st century. Of course 100 years ago a person could be shot or hit with a cane for saying such things. 

And the police considered it just &quot;mutual combat&quot; and normally didn&#039;t arrest anyone. 

But back in 2020 the &quot;days&quot; told the christians to stay away from church. Because the &quot;days&quot; agreed with the government. 

But the &quot;days&quot; were allowed to have their B/L/M protests and parades. 

The &quot;days&quot; and not believers have never supported the 1st amendment. 

They believe s0c.i @-l  is.tis.m &quot;works.&quot;

It&#039;s good this was recorded so the world can see the REAL face of the &quot;days&quot; movement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61844">.40 cal Booger</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad the &#8220;days&#8221; have the 1st amendment right to say these things disgusting things in the 21st century. Of course 100 years ago a person could be shot or hit with a cane for saying such things. </p>
<p>And the police considered it just &#8220;mutual combat&#8221; and normally didn&#8217;t arrest anyone. </p>
<p>But back in 2020 the &#8220;days&#8221; told the christians to stay away from church. Because the &#8220;days&#8221; agreed with the government. </p>
<p>But the &#8220;days&#8221; were allowed to have their B/L/M protests and parades. </p>
<p>The &#8220;days&#8221; and not believers have never supported the 1st amendment. </p>
<p>They believe s0c.i @-l  is.tis.m &#8220;works.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good this was recorded so the world can see the REAL face of the &#8220;days&#8221; movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: .40 cal Booger		</title>
		<link>https://staging.shootingnewsweekly.com/ammunition/ninth-circuit-victory-on-hold-as-california-seeks-en-banc-rehearing/comment-page-1/#comment-61864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[.40 cal Booger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 12:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.shootingnewsweekly.com/?p=27376#comment-61864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BILD Does Journalism, Showing How Hamas Stages &#039;Starvation&#039; Photos.

https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/08/07/bild-does-journalism-showing-how-hamas-stages-starvation-photos-n3805583]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BILD Does Journalism, Showing How Hamas Stages &#8216;Starvation&#8217; Photos.</p>
<p><a href="https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/08/07/bild-does-journalism-showing-how-hamas-stages-starvation-photos-n3805583" rel="nofollow ugc">https://hotair.com/david-strom/2025/08/07/bild-does-journalism-showing-how-hamas-stages-starvation-photos-n3805583</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
